A shot in the dark
I asked Google about the comment \newboxedtheorem
and found the following page:
Nice boxes for your theorems with LaTeX using tikz
There the unsupported package boiboites
can be found. The code is very transparent and you can see that the command \newboxedtheorem
doesn't support the manipulation of counters like \netheorem
. You can set only one counter. The default usage is:
\newboxedtheorem{defi}{Definition}{thCounter}
So
your code fails
\newboxedtheorem[]{example}{theorem}{mycounter}
because you have to many arguments.
To allow the possibility of \newtheorem
you have to change the code of boiboites.sty
.
As discussed in the chat the package has no license information and must be classified as non-free. So you can download the code and use but I don't know whether we can manipulate this code here.
That's some interesting behaviour you observed! You could regard this as kind of a bug in the LaTeX kernel. So what's happening here? There's some vertical space below the display (\belowdisplayskip
) and after the theorem (the \thm@postskip
of 2cm
that you specified). Now LaTeX is designed such that it doesn't add the sum but the larger one of those two vertical spaces (which is good).
The problem arises in how the larger of the spaces is chosen. This is done in LaTeX's \@xaddvskip
, which only compares the "natural length" components of the spaces, but not the available stretch and shrink. In your case, \belowdisplayskip
is 4.19998pt plus 4.19998pt
and \thm@postskip
is 56.9055pt
. Usually the latter is larger, but you have a situation where the space is stretched about 128 times more than generally permitted (which is why you get an Underfull \vbox
warning!). Therefore, \belowdisplayskip
is actually the larger of the two spaces, but \@xaddvskip
adds only the smaller \thm@postskip
of 2cm
below the display.
In my opinion, a good solution is to work with the maximum of the two vertical spaces, in the following sense: use the maximum of the natural and stretch components, and the minimum of the shrink components. I've implemented an appropriate modification of \@xaddvskip
in the code below. In the left you see the output of your code, in the right the output produced with the modified \@xaddvskip
:

You can see that in the improved (right) version there's a bit more space below the equation than above. The reason is that above the equation \abovedisplayskip
is used (4.19998pt plus 4.19998pt
), and below the maximum of \belowdisplayskip
and \thm@postskip
, which amounts to 56.9055pt plus 4.19998pt
, so about 52.7pt
more than above. And that's good, since you wanted additional space below the theorem!
Note that the following code is just a proof of concept, it doesn't work as it should if infinite stretch or shrink components are involved.
\documentclass[a4paper]{amsart}
\makeatletter
\def\@xaddvskip{%
\ifdim\lastskip<\@tempskipb
\edef\last@stretch{\the\gluestretch\lastskip}
\edef\last@shrink{\the\glueshrink\lastskip}
\edef\next@stretch{\the\gluestretch\@tempskipb}
\edef\next@shrink{\the\glueshrink\@tempskipb}
\vskip-\lastskip
\dimen@=\@tempskipb
\vskip\dimen@ plus
\ifdim \last@stretch > \next@stretch
\last@stretch
\else
\next@stretch
\fi
minus
\ifdim \last@shrink < \next@shrink
\last@shrink
\else
\next@shrink
\fi
\else
\ifdim\@tempskipb<\z@
\ifdim\lastskip<\z@
\else
\advance\@tempskipb\lastskip
\vskip-\lastskip
\vskip \@tempskipb
\fi
\fi
\fi}
\makeatother
\usepackage{amsthm}
\newtheoremstyle{myplain} {2cm}% ⟨Space above⟩
{2cm}% ⟨Space below⟩
{\itshape}% ⟨Body font⟩
{}% ⟨Indent amount⟩
{\bfseries}% ⟨Theorem head font⟩
{.}% ⟨Punctuation after theorem head⟩
{.5em}% ⟨Space after theorem head⟩2
{}% ⟨Theorem head spec (can be left empty, meaning ‘normal’)⟩
\theoremstyle{myplain}
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}
\begin{document}
\begin{theorem}
It holds
\begin{equation}
2+2=4
\end{equation}
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
Straightforward.
\end{proof}
\bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip
\bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip
\bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip
\bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip
\bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip
\bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip
\bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip
\bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip \bigskip
\begin{gather}
2\\
2\\
2\\
\end{gather}
\end{document}
Just for completeness, here's my original e-TeX-free implementation of \getstretch
and \getshrink
:
\begingroup
\catcode`P=12
\catcode`L=12
\catcode`U=12
\catcode`S=12
\catcode`M=12
\catcode`I=12
\catcode`N=12
\catcode`T=12
\lowercase{
\def\x{%
\def\getstretch##1{\expandafter\get@stretch\the##1PLUS 0PT\endmarker}
\def\get@stretch##1PLUS##2PT##3\endmarker{##2}
\def\getshrink##1{\expandafter\get@shrink\the##1MINUS 0PT\endmarker}
\def\get@shrink##1MINUS##2PT##3\endmarker{##2}
}}
\expandafter\endgroup\x
Best Answer
The default spacing above and below the
plain
theorem style (used in yourthm
theorem) is\topsep
, which is larger than3pt
. Use\topsep
in yourexamp
theorem environment to achieve a similar spacing to that ofthm
.\topsep
is defined as the length8.0pt plus 2.0pt minus 4.0pt
which is8pt
plus/minus some stretchability (could be anything from4pt
to10pt
), depending on the placement within the context of the page. Of course, you can change this (currently set at3pt
in your code) to whatever, to modify the separation from other document elements.