geometrymargins
I'm trying to update a old template. Therefore I want to replace the vmargin package by the geometry package:
Code before:
\setpapersize{A4}
\setmarginsrb{3cm}{1cm}{3cm}{1cm}{6mm}{7mm}{5mm}{15mm}
Code after:
\geometry{a4paper,left=30mm,top=10mm,right=30mm,bottom=10mm,headheight=6mm,headsep=7mm,foot=5mm,footskip=15mm}
However, the margins are not the same. For example, the header line is much higher than before. Is there a way, to get the same margins by using the geometry package?
Thomas
This is easily done, as @ChristianHupfer said, using the geometry package.
It has a nice way to set the margins while calling the usepackage directive. While a full answer, detailing all of the option is in the package manual, here is a shortcut specific for your answer. Since you provide oddsidemargin and evensidemargin I assume you have a twoside document.
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage[width=15.5cm,
height=23.5cm,
top=1.5cm,
inner=0.7cm,
outer=1.2cm]{geometry}
\begin{document}
\end{document}
I used also a4paper as a documentclass option and the showframe package in order to show the frame for my example. Please double check that your margins are alright for whatever paper size you are using. Also, the geometry package has nice papersize options I invite you to checkout
The changepage package is useful for temporarily change the page parameters, based on the current values, so it's compatible with several other packages; particularly useful is its adjustwidth environment.
On the other hand, geometry and vmargin are useful to set the overall shape of the page without doing complicated computations involving \topmargin, \evensidemargin and \oddsidemargin and several other parameters.
The approach of the two packages is different; vmargin has two different eight argument commands for setting the main parameters, while geometry offers a much more flexible key-value interface. Moreover geometry also handles page imposition (a page layout built on a smaller page than the one the document is printed on, with crop marks) and the \newgeometry feature that allows to change the page parameters as many times as we need (but requires a page break, due to how TeX handles pages).
Also changepage provides for changing the page height and width, but with an interface I consider difficult to manage, while \newgeometry uses the same key-value interface as \geometry (or the options to \usepackage[...]{geometry}).
Which one to prefer? The answer is easy: vmargin makes a bad error when doing its computations for the page parameters, because it usually sets \hoffset and \voffset to -1in (see section 3.3 in the documentation), which breaks other packages (notably atbegshi on which eso-pic and pdfpages are based) that, coherently with the recommendations in source2e (the commented source code of LaTeX), assume \hoffset and \voffset are zero.
There is another package that's worth mentioning, that is, typearea, part of the KOMA-script suite. Its approach in setting the page parameters is completely different from geometry's because it's based on page divisions: divide the height and width of the page by the same integer, create an imaginary subdivision into rectangles and take some of them as the type block (more details in the guide to KOMA-script). It doesn't support page imposition, but works well with crop. It doesn't conflict with atbegshi.
Note also that the memoir class and the AMS classes have their own methods for setting the page parameters, but using geometry with them is possible.
Of course one should never forget the \enlargethispage feature, which is in the LaTeX kernel, that may help in easily solving pagination problems without having to change the overall shape of the type block.
Best Answer
The difference in height is as a result of
includeheadfoot. Add this option to yourgeometryspecification.As an example showcasing the similar output, consider the following code using
vmargin:Assume the output is
vmargin_exampe.pdf. Now compile: