The command \pgfmathparse{asin(1/\x)}
yields for each \x
in the range of 125 to 142 the same value, whereas \pgfmathparse{1/\x}
yields the much more precise values for each \x
. Is the ArcSin function of PGF that imprecise?
What can i do to get more precise results?
MWE:
\documentclass[11pt]{minimal}
\usepackage{tikz}
\usetikzlibrary{calc}
\begin{document}
\begin{tikzpicture}
\foreach \x in {120,121,...,150}
{
\pgfmathparse{1/\x}\let\fraction\pgfmathresult
\pgfmathparse{asin(\fraction)}\let\angle\pgfmathresult
\node at (0, \x/2-60) {\x, \fraction, \angle};
}
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{document}
Best Answer
There are different math engines that can be used with pgf/TikZ.
Library
fixedpointarithmetic