My microscopic equation is 2.8 points too wide for some reason, which is quite a lot. I am reluctant to ignore the warning because if I get more of them I'll start missing important things.

Code is:

```
Applying Snell's law (Equation \eqref{eq:snell}) twice gives us:
\begin{align}
\theta_2 &= arcsin \left( \frac{n_{vacuum}}{n_{mylar}} sin(\theta_1) \right) \\
\theta_1 &= arcsin \left( \frac{n_{mylar}}{n_{vacuum}} sin(\theta_0) \right)
\end{align}
which simplifies to
\begin{equation}
\theta_2 = \theta_0
\end{equation}
We saw earlier that there was a critical angle [blah blah more text...]
```

And the warning is:

```
Overfull \hbox (2.80157pt too wide) (page 6)
```

on line 226, which is the line containing the tiny `\theta_2 = \theta_0`

.

I'm probably missing something relatively obvious but I just can't see it. Any idea ?

## Best Answer

Local modification of the

mu-lengths/skips (math-unit skips) could condense the equation enough to avoid the warning yet still produce a consistent enough look to your equation compared to others. Herbert Voß' mathmode document illustrates the different locations wheremu-skips are used in an equation:The default setting for these

mu-skips arewhere

`1mu=0.05556em`

. Perhaps merely adding some shrinkability to`\thinmuskip=3mu minus 3mu`

would help.