You can use the command \mathlarger
of the relsize
package. It increases the size and it can be nested. For example:
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{amsmath}
\usepackage{relsize}
\begin{document}
\begin{equation}
\cos x = \mathlarger{\mathlarger{\sum}}_{n=0}^{\infty}\frac{(ix)^2n}{(2n)!}
\end{equation}
\end{document}

.....
Apart from \mathclap{…}
, mathtools
provides a command specifically set for these situations: \smashoperator{…}
. Which is, more or less, like putting \mathclap{…}
in both (sub and super scripts). Taking @tohecz advice about a'|a'
, your code will be like
\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{mathtools}
\begin{document}
\[
a(i,k) \gets \min\Bigl\{ 0, r(k,k) + \smashoperator{\sum_{i'\notin\{i,k\}}} \max\{0, r(i',k)\} \Bigr\}
\]
\end{document}
Which will be like all the other answers. Moreover, that command has an optional argument: lr
, default one, will smash both sides; r
only smash the right; and l
will smash the left. In the examples I will add some text over the operator so you can see how it works (it smashes both).

Best Answer
You can force the subscripts to be under the summation, by using
\limits
, like this:An alternative way is to change the typesetting style of the formula by using
\displaystyle
. You probably already noticed, that the typesetting of math differs depending on what 'mode' your in:inline math
ordisplay math
:Output: