[Tex/LaTex] LateX, BibTex, and citations not found by ArXiV

arxivbibliographiesbibtex

I have recently submitted a paper on ArXiv, along with the corresponding .bbl file; while the compilation and end results are fine, it appears that the SAO/NASA ADS service cannot parse the references to point to the ones that also appear on ArXiv.

To give an example, here is one excerpt of the bbl file:

\bibitem[ADK15]{ADK:15}
Jayadev Acharya, Constantinos Daskalakis, and Gautam Kamath.
\newblock Optimal testing for properties of distributions.
\newblock {\em CoRR}, abs/1507.05952, July 2015.

which point to this paper. However, the SAO/NASA ADS website does not seem to have found this reference, as it does not include a "References in the Article" link (which would list the corresponding cited arXiv papers, as e.g. is the case here).

Is there a simple reason for this, something I did wrong in my bibtex/bbl file?* Or is it just completely arbitrary?

*The part of my bib file corresponding to the above snippet is:

@article{ADK:15,
  title = {Optimal Testing for Properties of Distributions},
  author = {Acharya, Jayadev and Daskalakis, Constantinos and Kamath, Gautam},
  journal   = {CoRR},
  eprint = {1507.05952},
  volume = {abs/1507.05952},
  primaryClass = "cs.DS",
  year = 2015,
  month = jul,
  adsurl = {http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2015arXiv150705952A},
  adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}
}

Best Answer

Following @Jared Kulik's comment above, I contacted ADS directly to enter the missing (arXiV) citations they couldn't find. After a few days, they added them, so that they now appear on their system.

Oddly enough, immediately after (and therefore more than 3 weeks after the posting of the paper online), Google Scholar updated its records of the other papers cited in the bibliography (that is, not only these 3) to include the citations we have. Whether it is just a coincidence (and Google Scholar is only darned slow), or this adding 3 citations in the ADS system triggered something else for Google Scholar, leading to its parsing the other entries of the bibliography, I have no clue. But everything is well now.

Related Solutions

[Tex/LaTex] BibTex and Overleaf. Citations not working

[Tex/LaTex] arXiv reference in BibTex

The answers you link to is actually slightly confusing.

If you use bibtex to do your references, whether it can format an arXiv reference "sensibly" will depend on the style; but at any rate the standard styles, like unsrt don't; they are simply unaware of arXiv, having been devised long before it. People have found ways to "fake" something more or less acceptable ways of tricking it into outputting arXiv information, mostly by putting the arXiv information in some field that it does understand and print (e.g. pretending that the publication is @inproceedingsand putting the arXiv reference as a booktitle, or putting it into the note field). If you take this approach, you can basically choose anything that ends up with something you can live with; it's bound to be a bit of a fudge anyway.

Here, for instance, is an example of that (I've put the bibliography into the file using \filecontents:

\documentclass{article}
\usepackage{filecontents}
\begin{filecontents}{\jobname.bib}
@misc{HiggsBSM,
    author = {{Muhlleitner}, M.},
    title = "{Higgs Physics Beyond the Standard Model}",
    archivePrefix = "arXiv", 
    note = {arXiv:1410.5093},
    year = 2014,
    month = oct,
}\end{filecontents}

\begin{document}
\cite{HiggsBSM}
\bibliographystyle{unsrt}
\bibliography{\jobname}

\end{document}

And here is the result:

The alternative is to use biblatex. That's an alternative to bibtex. It is more modern, and more aware of things like eprint information. It's only drawbacks are (1) it may, depending on the style you choose, slightly alter the way other references are presented and (2) you use it in a slightly different way. In particular:

Instead of \bibliographystyle, you specify the style as an option when loading the package.
You need an \addbibresource{} in the preamble which specifies your .bib database file, with the extension
You use \printbibliography instead of \bibliography where you want the bibliography to print
You (preferably) use biber rather than bibtex to process the citations after LaTeX has run.

Here is an example of a file (using exactly your .bib data) with those changes and the output.

\documentclass[onecolumn,11pt]{article}
\usepackage{filecontents}
\begin{filecontents}{\jobname.bib}
@ARTICLE{HiggsBSM,
   author = {{Muhlleitner}, M.},
   title = "{Higgs Physics Beyond the Standard Model}",
   journal = {ArXiv e-prints},
   archivePrefix = "arXiv",
   eprint = {1410.5093},
   primaryClass = "hep-ph",
   keywords = {High Energy Physics - Phenomenology},
   year = 2014,
   month = oct}
\end{filecontents}
\usepackage[style=numeric,sorting=none]{biblatex}%<- specify style
\addbibresource{\jobname.bib}%<- specify bib file
\begin{document}

\cite{HiggsBSM}

\printbibliography%<-print bibliography

% Now run LaTex, then biber, then LaTeX (maybe more than once)

\end{document}

Which produces

Personally, I'd use biblatex if you can (which for a bachelor's thesis you probably can), especially if you are expecting to cite this sort of material often. If you want further information to get you started, apart from the biblatex manual, you might look at this question: biblatex for beginners and this sharelatex resource. There's also a handy cheatsheet on CTAN and a rather long form document which is gentler than the manual on github.

Best Answer

Related Solutions

[Tex/LaTex] BibTex and Overleaf. Citations not working

[Tex/LaTex] arXiv reference in BibTex

Related Question