[Tex/LaTex] Large $\forall$ math-modesymbols How to get larger $\forall$ symbol? Adding \Big$ doesn't work. Best Answer This is the most modest increment on Seamus' and Martin Scharrer's comments above: if you use it more than once, you may as well go ahead and define \newcommand\bigforall{\mbox{\Large $\mathsurround0pt\forall$}} which will co-operate with the mathmode context you will likely be using the symbol in. Related Solutions[Tex/LaTex] Large \perp symbol and proper circled \perp symbol This is what I can offer for a \bigperp command: \documentclass{article} \usepackage{amsmath} \usepackage{graphicx} \makeatletter \newcommand{\bigperp}{% \mathop{\mathpalette\bigp@rp\relax}% \displaylimits } \newcommand{\bigp@rp}[2]{% \vcenter{ \m@th\hbox{\scalebox{\ifx#1\displaystyle2.1\else1.5\fi}{$#1\perp$}} }% } \makeatother \begin{document} $ \displaystyle\bigperp\sum \textstyle\bigperp\sum \scriptstyle\bigperp\sum \scriptscriptstyle\bigperp\sum $ $\displaystyle\bigperp_{i=1}^{n} U_{i}$ \end{document} Math Mode Symbols – How to Get a Large Division Symbol I understand it's only an example, but your usage of \left and \right is wrong. \begin{align} something &\biggl(\sum_{n}\nonumber\\ &\quad+y\biggr) \bigg/ x^2. \end{align} Related Question[Tex/LaTex] How to negate \forallSymbols – Understanding \mediumvee and \mediumwedge
Best Answer
This is the most modest increment on Seamus' and Martin Scharrer's comments above: if you use it more than once, you may as well go ahead and define
which will co-operate with the mathmode context you will likely be using the symbol in.