For forthcoming articles of the sort that you give in your question, the easiest solution is to simply format them as article type, and then put "to appear" in the pages field. A forthcoming article won't have a page range yet, and when the article is published you will have to add the page range anyway. In the econ bibliography style, (and in fact most bibliography styles for article) the page range appears last in the entry, so it will be formatted as you wish.
Alternatively, (as pointed out in the comments) you can add the "to appear" as a note field. To do this in BibDesk, you need to do the following:
- Open the entry for the article
- In the Publication menu, choose Add Field
- In the pulldown textbox, choose Note
This solution is semantically good, but in practice it may not be as robust as putting the "to appear" in the pages field, since the appearance of the field depends on the particular bibliography style you are using; if the style isn't set up to output the note field, then the problem will reappear.
(Another common way to do this is to not give a year, and replace the year field with "to appear". This will, of course, replace it in both bibliography and citations.)
For chapters in books, the incollection entry type should be used. The inbook entry (which may have been what you were using) is really designed for referring to a particular chapter of a single-authored or edited book; you're not likely to use it much at all, since most citations of that sort can be done using the book entry and adding the chapter reference to the citation command.
There is a package backref for use with BibTeX, which also works with Hyperref.
With Hyperref it should suffice to add a package option backref or backref=page.
It is not compatible with BibLaTeX, which has an option backref=true, false.
Best Answer
I think the best policy is never to talk of chapter numbers in the reflist at all, and move talk of chapter numbers, on the few occasions they are needed, to the citation in the main text. But of course you can't always choose. So, if you must use a particular Bibtex style that uses chapters, then include them in your
*.bibfiles, and avoid Bibtex styles that allow you to refer to chapter numbers in the reference list whenever you can.Notes on citation style
Citation styles vary, but IMO the cleanest policy is the following:
{thebibliography}environment calls the References section/chapter), and refer only to page numbers in references for articles in journals and collected articles;This policy is followed by The Chicago Manual of Style and the Publication Manual of the APA, and is supported by the
{natbib}and{apalike}Bibtex styles.Example
Reflist
(We are interested in chapter one of the collected articles of George Boolos, a fact we never mention, since we have the title of the chapter and the page numbers in the reflist. We are interested in three chapters of Peter Johnstone's work, which we don't mention in the reflist, but do in the citation in the main text).
Citations in main text
The cumulative hierarchy had a long prior history, but was not taken seriously as the intellectual foundation of Zermelo-Fränkel set theory until the landmark work of Boolos (1971). In the following, we shall assume the treatment of ZFC given by Johnstone (1987, chapters 5-7).