We are about to submit a paper to Elsevier, but it seems that something is wrong (or we are doing it wrong) in the front matter. This is the code bit:
\author[FFNS]{One Author\corref{mycorrespondingauthor}}
\cortext[mycorrespondingauthor]{Correspondence should be addressed
to One Author, Laboratory for Something, Faculty of
Anotherthing, University of Thirdthing. Email: {\tt one.author@e.mail}}
And this is how it looks in pdf:
What is going on here?
Thanks to both darthbith and jean-sébastien-gosselin (but especially darthbith who kindly taught me some manners [ 😉 ]), I patiently made a minimal example, and then figured out what seems to be the problem. To explain the details, I am attaching two examples: one with short abstract (short tex;short pdf) and one with long abstract that spreads over the front and first page (long tex; long pdf).
In brief, in shortAbs I added \newpage at the beginning of the body, and that made the difference — neat, readable compilation. (Without \newpage pdf will still be compiled with that ugly error!) In longAbs, since abstract is over two pages, I did not figure out how to fix this.
Now, I can ask better questions, I suppose: if the abstract is long and you use elsarticle document class, how to make correspondence note and a note about journal and the date not to overlap?
Thanks!
Best Answer
The problem seems to originate from the use of
linenumbers
in theabstract
environment as discussed here: Problem with elsarticle and lineno. A workaround would be to move thelinenumbers
command to the main body of the article such as in this MWE:Which yields a 2-pages article with the abstract spilling on 2 pages, without the overlapping text in the footer note. The lines of the abstract won't be numbered though.