Froude number is a dimensionless number defined as the ratio of the flow inertia to the external field. The latter in many applications simply due to gravity;
$Fr=u_0/ \sqrt{g_0l_0}$

where $u_0$ is a characteristic flow velocity,

$g_0$ is in general a characteristic external field,

and $l_0$ is a characteristic lenght.

When Froude number, $Fr=1$ the inertia and the field is in balance.

Ie. in Open channel flow this is the minimum energy condition.

Thus it would be logical, that this *"Air Entrainment hook"* would also occur at $Fr=1$, as at that point the Venturi effect, which may be derived from a combination of Bernoulli's principle and the continuity equation, would cause the pressure in pipe to be exactly the same as it is in the surface. This situation is needed to be able to connect a vortex according to the Helmholtz second theorem.

From the picture presented in question, it can be seen how the Air core enters the intake some distance away from the pipe wall. The exact reason for this, is the fact that the Froude Number can and should be looked very locally. The typical flow velocity distribution in a pipe is shown in the picture below;

"a" is Laminar, and "b" is Turbulent. Both of the flows has a low velocity near the wall. High velocity means low pressure, so basically it should be expected the vortex to go out from the middle of the pipe, where the velocity is at highest. This is the case when the pipe is vertical, but at the horizontal pipe, the hydrostatic pressure changes the concept; as the pressure grows linearly with the depth. This causes the vortex to end above the center line. At the picture below the entrance is laminar,and thus the vortexes goes deeper without bursting and also nearer to the pipe center.

From the picture in question, it can also seen that the Vortex ends some distance inside the pipe, instead of ending at the entrance. Further it can be noted, that vortex is already disturbed, but still existing before it's totally broke in single bubbles. The reason for this is the velocity stack at entrance; picture below;

At the intake, the flow area is pinched down, due to the flow conditions in this particular experiment.

**Conclutions:**
The physical explanation for the "Air Entrainment hook" is, that it occures at $Fr=1$; when Froude number is calculated from the correct characteristic velocity and characteristic length. In the case of this experiment, the approximately correct values, can be found from the picture below, Marked with red.

This approach is practical, as these values can be quite easily defined. You basically only need to know the flow rate and some pressure measurement from the zone where the Vortex has completely bursted. This way the intake losses can be defined, and the amount of the velocity stack to be estimated. With the pinched down pipe diameter a more describing flow velocity can be defined. A more describing height can also be defined as shown in the picture above. The exact values are practically impossible to define, as the intake loss and the amount how much the pipe is pinched down varies constantly.

**Answer;**

**The Air Entrainment"hook" happens in $Fr=1$, as at this point the conditions according to Helmholtz second theorem are met. The Froude number must be calculated by the correct characteristic velocity and lenght. These are shown in the picture below. The green arc describes one possible velocity distribution.**

## Best Answer

Consider the Navier-Stokes equations $$\frac{\partial \bf{u}}{\partial t}+\bf{u}\cdot\nabla \bf{u}=-\nabla p+\nu \nabla^2\bf{u}.$$

We can rewrite the inertial term as $$\bf{u}\cdot\nabla \bf{u}=\frac{1}{2}\bf{u}^2-\bf{u}\times\boldsymbol{\omega}.$$

Therefore, the Navier-Stokes equations can be rewritten as

$$\frac{\partial \bf{u}}{\partial t}=-\nabla\left( p+\frac{1}{2}\bf{u}^2\right)+\bf{u}\times \boldsymbol{\omega}+\nu \nabla^2\bf{u}.$$

We see that the Vortex force, i.e. $\bf{u}\times \boldsymbol{\omega}$, shows up on the RHS of our equations, and makes it clear that velocity-vorticity interactions can accelerate the flow. There are many examples where this perspective offers insight. I am going to give one below.

Let us consider Langmuir circulations. These were first reported by Nobel laureate Irving Langmuir$^*$ on a trip he was taking across the Atlantic. These circulations, basically counter-rotating rolls, are an extremely important process in upper ocean dynamics, as they mix the upper ocean, which then modulates air-sea interactions. A picture of these rolls is shown below.

The derivation of the equations describing Langmuir circulation, known as the Craik-Leibovich equations, is pretty involved as one must grind through a great deal of algebra. Useful references are Craik & Leibovich (1976), and Leibovich's review in 1983.

Very heuristically, we consider a wave field, that contains Stokes drift $\bf{u}_s$. This drift is due to the slightly elliptical orbits that finite amplitude (Stokes) waves have. It is a flux of mass.

Now, if one properly sets up their scales, does the right averaging etc they end up with the equation

$$\frac{\partial \bf{v}}{\partial t}+\bf{v}\cdot \nabla \bf{v} = -\nabla p +\bf{F_{vor}}+\nu\nabla^2 \bf{v}$$

where $\bf{v}$ is the velocity of the (slow) mean flow, $p$ the pressure,$\nu$ the kinematic viscosity, and

$$\bf{F}_{vor}=\bf{u}_s\times \boldsymbol{\omega},$$

where $\boldsymbol{\omega} = \nabla \times \bf{v}$. Note this is the vortex force we discussed above.

So, in this context, the mean flow obeys something analogous to the Navier-Stokes equations, $\bf{PLUS}$ the vortex force due to the interaction of the Stokes drift and the mean flow.

Let's consider an example, shown in this figure

The stokes drift is shown here as $U^s$. We consider an initial perturbation, $u'$, as shown by the arrows on the left side of the figure. If one works out the curl in $\bf{F}_{vor}$, they see that this would then lead to convergence of the flow, and then necessarily to downwelling. This then decreases with depth, forming the rolls known as Langmuir circulations.

$^*$ Langmuir worked with Kurt Vonnegut's brother (who was a climate scientist), and formed the basis for the character Felix Hoenikker in Cat's Cradle.