Below are my attempted definitions of the two terms. Are these correct and do they clearly distinguish between the two terms?

My understanding is that the **displacement vector** comes first and that is then used to define the **position vector**.

**Definition 1.** The *displacement vector between two points $A$ and $B$* is the vector $\overrightarrow{AB}$.

**Definition 2.** The *position vector of a point $A$* is the displacement vector between the origin $O$ and the point $A$.

Another related question: If Definition 1 above is "correct", what then, if any, is the formal distinction between a **displacement vector** and a **vector**?

## Best Answer

Fundamentally, they are all just vectors (you can apply the same math to them and the same axioms hold). The distinction in the names is merely a convenient way to convey their purpose more concretely.

You are correct that a displacement vector between $A$ and $B$ is generally the vector $\vec{AB}$ defining the displacement a particle would make going from point $A$ to point $B$.

The position vector is just the (displacement) vector from some arbitrary but defined reference point, usually called the origin, $O$.

The key to remember in the end however is that they are all just vectors ie: $vec{AB}$, $vec{OA}$... and that they all share the same properties and operations. There is nothing special about the position vector vs the displacement vector other than the name allowing us to quickly associate it with a given starting point.