$2ix^4 − 10x^3 + (4 − 2i)x + 8 + 6i$ irreducible in $\mathbb Z[i][x]$ and in $\mathbb Q[i][x]$

abstract-algebrairreducible-polynomialspolynomials

I am revising for exams and have got stuck on the question in my revision,

Decide if $2ix^4 − 10x^3 + (4 − 2i)x + 8 + 6i$ is irreducible in $\mathbb Z[i][x]$ and in $\mathbb Q[i][x]$ and justify your claim.

Usually, I would check if the polynomial was primitive, show by Eisenstein it is irreducible in $\mathbb Z[i][x]$ and then use Gauss to show it is also irreducible in $\mathbb Q[i][x]$ but I don't think this is primitive and 2 can also be factored out.

Does this mean it isn't irreducible in either? Surely not if the question is worth 12 marks?

Best Answer

Over $\Bbb{Z}[i]$ do whatever your book says about non-unit constant factors (i.e. non-primitive polynomials). I'm used to the convention that irreducibility in $\Bbb{Z}[i][x]$ means not a product of lower degree polynomials, but other knowledgeable commenters disagree.

Anyway, the familiar techniques from $\Bbb{Z}[x]$ have their analogues in $\Bbb{Z}[i][x]$ as $\Bbb{Z}[i]$ is a UFD.


After cancelling the factor $2i$ you are left with the monic (hence primitive) polynomial $$ f(x)=x^4+5ix^3+(-1-2i)x+3-4i. $$ Eisenstein's criterion does not work, but we can reduce modulo a prime, and see what we learn. Let's try the other prime factor $p=2+i$ of $5$. We have $\Bbb{Z}[i]/\langle p\rangle\simeq\Bbb{Z}_5$ and $i\equiv3\pmod p.$

Reduction modulo $p$ gives thus $$ \overline{f}(x)=x^4-2x+1\in\Bbb{Z}_5[x]. $$ We see that $\overline{f}(1)=0$, so it has a factor $x-1$. Division leaves us with $$ \overline{f}(x)=(x-1)(x^3+x^2+x-1).\tag{1} $$ It is quick to check that the cubic factor has no zeros in $\Bbb{Z}_5$. So, by virtue of being cubic, it is irreducible over $\Bbb{Z}_5$.

For us this has the important corollary that the only way $f(x)$ can factor over $\Bbb{Z}[i]$ is as a product of a linear and a cubic factor. In other words, unless $f(x)$ has a zero in $\Bbb{Q}(i)$, it is irreducible. The analogue of the rational root theorem then kicks in. That putative root, call it $\alpha$, must actually be an element of $\Bbb{Z}[i]$, and also a factor of $3-4i=i(2-i)^2$. In other words $\alpha=i^a(2-i)^b$ with $a\in\{0,1,2,3\}$, $b\in\{0,1,2\}$. Furthermore, equation $(1)$ implies that $\alpha\equiv1\pmod p$. As $$ 1\equiv i^a(2-i)^b\equiv3^a(2-3)^b=3^a(-1)^b\pmod p $$ we can deduce that $a$ must be even and the parity of $b$ is determined. The list of candidates is thus

  • $\alpha=1$, $\alpha=(2-i)^2$ (when $a=0$), and
  • $\alpha=-(2-i)$ (when $a=2$)

(see professor Lubin's answer for an explanation as to why only the last candidate is actually viable). It is easy to check that none of those three candidates is a zero of $f$. Hence $f$ is irreducible in $\Bbb{Z}[i][x]$ and, by Gauss' Lemma and friends, also in $\Bbb{Q}(i)[x]$.