From my model, I'm asked to determine which variables are statistically significant.
fitted.model <- lm(spending ~ sex + status + income, data=spending)
My results were as follows:
Coefficients:
Estimate Std. Error t value Pr(>|t|)
(Intercept) 22.55565 17.19680 1.312 0.1968
sex **-22.11833** 8.21111 -2.694 0.0101 *
status 0.05223 0.28111 0.186 0.8535
income 4.96198 1.02539 4.839 1.79e-05 ***
verbal -2.95949 2.17215 -1.362 0.1803
Signif. codes: 0 ‘***’ 0.001 ‘**’ 0.01 ‘*’ 0.05 ‘.’ 0.1 ‘ ’ 1
Residual standard error: 22.69 on 42 degrees of freedom
Multiple R-squared: 0.5267, Adjusted R-squared: 0.4816
F-statistic: 11.69 on 4 and 42 DF, p-value: 1.815e-06.
Question: Do I have to look at the last column? If so, then sex
and income
would be statistically significant.
Best Answer
Yes, based on the output,
sex
andincome
are statistically significant.sex
and possiblystatus
are nominal variables, so it's odd that they appear in the model as is. It could work, if they are 0/1 variables, but it still opens up the potential for error.To be on the safe side, for
sex
and any other nominal variable, include it in the model like this:factor(sex)
: